Dr. Maryam Ramezanzadehmoghadam

Students, especially those outside the field of cybersecurity, are increasingly turning to Large Language Model (LLM)-based generative AI tools for coding assistance. These AI code generators provide valuable support to developers by generating code based on provided input and instructions. However, the quality and accuracy of the generated code can vary, depending on factors such as task complexity, the clarity of instructions, and the model’s familiarity with the programming language. Additionally, these generated codes may inadvertently utilize vulnerable built-in functions, potentially leading to source code vulnerabilities and exploits. This research undertakes an in-depth analysis and comparison of code generation, code completion, and security suggestions offered by prominent AI models, including OpenAI CodeX, CodeBert, and ChatGPT. The research aims to evaluate the effectiveness and security aspects of these tools in terms of their code generation, code completion capabilities, and their ability to enhance security. This analysis serves as a valuable resource for developers, enabling them to proactively avoid introducing security vulnerabilities in their projects. By doing so, developers can significantly reduce the need for extensive revisions and resource allocation, whether in the short or long term.

Deepfakes are realistic-looking fake media generated by deep-learning algorithms that iterate through large datasets until they have learned how to solve the given problem (i.e., swap faces or objects in video and digital content). The massive generation of such content and modification technologies is rapidly affecting the quality of public discourse and the safeguarding of human rights. Deepfakes are being widely used as a malicious source of misinformation in court that seek to sway a court’s decision. Because digital evidence is critical to the outcome of many legal cases, detecting deepfake media is extremely important and in high demand in digital forensics. As such, it is important to identify and build a classifier that can accurately distinguish between authentic and disguised media, especially in facial-recognition systems as it can be used in identity protection too. In this work, we compare the most common, state-of-the-art face-detection classifiers such as Custom CNN, VGG19, and DenseNet-121 using an augmented real and fake face-detection dataset. Data augmentation is used to boost performance and reduce computational resources. Our preliminary results indicate that VGG19 has the best performance and highest accuracy of 95% when compared with other analyzed models.