Student Growth Models for Hard-to-Measure Course Content Areas (Performing Arts, Visual Arts, and Physical Education) Project Number: 171-RG111-4C, TAPS Number: 14AT47: A review of the literature, survey of U.S. practices, and recommendations
Melanie DiLoreto, Valerie Morganson, James E. Arruda, Kristen Kessler, Mylene Biddle, Sadie O’Neill, Sean Crawford, Raymond Sunwall, Angela Kildare and Steven J. Kass
04/30/2014
Metrics
38 File views/ downloads
268 Record Views
Abstract
The proceeding report is compiled into three parts to address the assessment of hard-to-measure content areas of performing arts, visual arts, and physical education.
Part I: This section includes a literature review on the background of assessments and its current role in the U.S. education system. Also summarized is the use of value-added models and performance evaluations. This information is then related to teacher effectiveness and evaluation. Next, the current state of hard-to-measure content areas is discussed including curriculum, instruction, and assessment of performing arts, visual arts, and physical education.
Part II: Part II contains the research results from a survey conducted on the curriculum, instruction, and assessment of these areas in all fifty U.S. states and the District of Columbia. To conduct this research, multiple representatives from each state’s department of education were contacted via phone and email to respond to survey questions concerning performing arts, visual arts, and physical education content areas and use of value-added-models. The results of this survey are summarized and additional information is reported concerning the federal government’s framework for student assessment.
Part III: This section draws from the data gathered in Parts I and II to provide general recommendations for assessment. Comprehensive assessment, including both quantitative and qualitative data and multiple assessment methods, is emphasized. Additionally, issues such as involvement of stakeholders, continuous monitoring and improvement, issues of validity and reliability (e.g., rubric-driven assessment), are emphasized. Value-added models are also discussed. In addition to general assessment implications, Part III includes recommendations specific to assessment of performing arts, visual arts, and physical education.
Files and links (1)
pdf
A review of the literature, survey of U.S. practices, and recommendations1.59 MBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)Report pdf Open Access
Related links
Details
Title
Student Growth Models for Hard-to-Measure Course Content Areas (Performing Arts, Visual Arts, and Physical Education) Project Number: 171-RG111-4C, TAPS Number: 14AT47
Resource Type
Report
Format
pdf
Number of pages
105
Copyright
Permission granted to the University of West Florida Libraries to digitize and/or display this information for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires the permission of the copyright holder.
Identifiers
99380090331106600
Academic Unit
School of Education
Language
English
Access the Argo Scholar Commons Lib Guide
Return to the libraries' main page
Access answers to the questions we get the most
A review of the literature, survey of U.S. practices, and recommendations