Medically assisted death (MAiD) allows terminally ill adults to end life intentionally to relieve suffering and preserve dignity, while life-sustaining treatments like ventilation or dialysis prolong life in irreversible conditions (Twycross, 2024). Both approaches impact patient autonomy and quality of life: MAiD enables informed choices and may reduce suffering, whereas life-sustaining treatments can support or limit autonomy depending on preferences. Healthcare providers face ethical challenges in MAiD and need clear guidelines (Hébert & Asri, 2022; Henderson et al., 2025). System barriers also affect access, making patient choice a key concern (Hewitt et al., 2024). This project examines how MAiD versus continued life-sustaining treatment affects autonomy and quality of life.
Files and links (1)
mp4
Patient Autonomy and Quality of Life in Terminal Illness: Comparing Medically Assisted Death with Life-Sustaining Interventions122.85 MBDownloadView
Video Presentation mp4 Open Access
Related links
Details
Title
Patient Autonomy and Quality of Life in Terminal Illness: Comparing Medically Assisted Death with Life-Sustaining Interventions
Resource Type
Presentation
Event
2026
Contributors
Prasanthi Sumudrika Ilankoon Mudiyanselage (Faculty Mentor) - University of West Florida, Usha Kundu, MD College of Health
Copyright
Permission granted to the University of West Florida Libraries by the author to digitize and/or display this information for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires the permission of the copyright holder.
Identifiers
99381741496906600
Academic Unit
School of Nursing; Usha Kundu, MD College of Health; BSN Virtual Student Scholarly Poster Showcase
Language
English
Patient Autonomy and Quality of Life in Terminal Illness: Comparing Medically Assisted Death with Life-Sustaining Interventions