Logo image
Free Movement in Birth vs. Conventional Birth Positions
Presentation   Open access

Free Movement in Birth vs. Conventional Birth Positions

Carlyne Woodrow, Madison Swenson and Isabelle Thurmond
Integration of Evidence in Professional Nursing Practice Research Presentations, Research presentations (University of West Florida, Pensacola, Florida, 11/2025)
11/2025

Metrics

8 File views/ downloads
21 Record Views

Abstract

Maternal position during the second stage of labor (from full dilation to birth) is an influential and modifiable factor that affects maternal and neonatal outcomes. Factors that are affected include length of second stage laboring, mode of delivery (increased use of assistive devices such as forceps, vacuums or cesarean), perineal trauma, blood loss/hemorrhaging, fetal heart rate changes, and maternal birth experience. Several recent reviews found that upright and lateral positions often improved outcomes (i.e. shorter second stage, fewer episiotomies) while horizontal positions such as lithotomy/supine (conventional) were associated with worse outcomes (i.e. longer second stage, more abnormal fetal heart rate patterns and greater risk of severe perineal trauma) in some studies. These differences make positioning a practical, non-pharmacologic intervention that nurses and midwives can use to improve safety and patient experience during labor and postpartum.
mp4
Free Movement in Birth vs. Conventional Birth Positions 21.55 MBDownloadView
PresentationPresentation mp4 Open Access

Related links

Details

Logo image