Logo image
Delayed Cord Clamping vs. Immediate Cord Clamping in Newborns: Effects on Intraventricular Hemorrhage and Neonatal Outcomes
Presentation   Open access

Delayed Cord Clamping vs. Immediate Cord Clamping in Newborns: Effects on Intraventricular Hemorrhage and Neonatal Outcomes

Hannah Fortner, Alyssa Hanners, Gymary Donato Rivera, Jared Fox Lollie and Alicia Pineda
2026
2026

Metrics

1 Record Views

Abstract

Newborns are at risk for complications including intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), anemia, and hemodynamic instability. IVH remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and long-term neurologic impairment affecting 20% to 40% of babies, especially those that are preterm and underweight (Deger et al., 2021). This is possibly because blood vessels in a baby’s brain are very fragile and can break easily (Stanford Medicine Children’s Health, n.d). Historically, immediate cord clamping (ICC) was routine practice. However, some research shows that delayed cord clamping (DCC) allows continued placental transfusion, increasing neonatal blood volume, improving hemoglobin levels, and decreasing the risk of IVH (Ofojebe et al., 2021; Rabe et al., 2019). Nonetheless, investigation is still warranted to determine if there are any risks or harmful consequences associated with DCC. Determining the safest and most effective cord management strategy is critical to improving outcomes in this vulnerable population.
mp4
Delayed Cord Clamping vs. Immediate Cord Clamping in Newborns: effects on Intraventricular Hemorrhage and Neonatal Outcomes108.65 MBDownloadView
Video Presentation mp4 Open Access

Related links

Details

Logo image