Logo image
A Two-Stage Statistical Framework for Evaluating Associative Interference in Large Language Models
Preprint   Open access

A Two-Stage Statistical Framework for Evaluating Associative Interference in Large Language Models

Achraf Cohen and Andrew Kincaid
06/12/2026

Metrics

1 Record Views

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) Implicit Association Test (IAT) two-stage modeling structured response patterns Machine Learning Mathematical Models Mathematics
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly evaluated for bias using adaptations of human psychological paradigms, yet methodological limitations-particularly the conflation of refusal behavior with task performance-have hindered clear interpretation. Here, we adapt the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to a controlled, forced-choice framework and introduce a two-stage modeling approach that separates response compliance from task-consistent classification. Across three contemporary LLMs (Claude Sonnet-4, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and GPT-5), we evaluate associative interference, defined as reduced task-consistency in incongruent relative to congruent conditions. While compliance with the structured response format was uniformly high, interference effects varied substantially across models and domains. Claude Sonnet-4 exhibited strong interference in the Gender–Career domain (DeltaP = 0.086, 95% CrI [0.026, 0.173]) and smaller but credible effects in Gender–Science. Gemini 2.5 Pro showed attenuated interference, and GPT-5 exhibited minimal or no detectable interference across domains. These findings demonstrate that IAT-style associative asymmetries are not a universal property of LLMs, but instead depend on model-specific characteristics. By isolating interference from compliance and modeling item-level variability, this study provides a principled framework for evaluating structured response patterns in LLMs. The results highlight the importance of model-specific assessment and suggest that associative interference can be substantially mitigated in modern systems.
url
A Two-Stage Statistical Framework for Evaluating Associative Interference in Large Language ModelsView
Preprint link to article Open CC BY V4.0

Details

Logo image