This study delves into the significant ethical criteria in the context of global standards. It addresses the moral wrongdoings and adverse side effects associated with global value chains as discussed in the business ethics literature. The methodology involves theoretical application and synthesis. The study employs ethical principles from deontology, consequentialism, and political cosmopolitanism to establish normative criteria such as "injustice and harm to others" and "bad outcomes." It further investigates how these criteria should influence consumers' decisions, actions, and responsibilities. These criteria are then used to examine the moral wrongdoings and negative effects mentioned in global standards. The study explores how global standards implicitly express consumers' roles in governing global value chains. It scrutinizes consumers' actions and decisions by applying ethical frameworks to global standards. The study outlines consumers' individual and political responsibilities in achieving the goals of global standards. The research findings have implications for governments, consumers, and organizations in practicing shared responsibility. The aim of this research is to provide normative guidance for responsible actions.
Files and links (2)
pdf
Global standards and the philosophy of consumption1,014.34 kBDownloadView
Published (Version of record)Article pdfCC BY-NC V4.0, Open Access
url
Global standards and the philosophy of consumptionView
Published (Version of record)link to articleCC BY-NC V4.0, Open
Related links
Details
Title
Global standards and the philosophy of consumption
Publication Details
Business ethics, the environment & responsibility, Vol.34(1), pp.280-294
Resource Type
Journal article
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Format
link
Number of pages
15
Grant note
State government of Schleswig- Holstein (Germany) SAS-2016-IfW-LWC / Leibniz Association