Anchoring, affect, and efficiency of sports gaming markets around playoff positioning
Kevin Krieger, R. Daniel Pace, Nicholas Clarke and Clay Girdner
Financial Services Review, Vol.24(4), pp.313-329
24
2015
Metrics
387 File views/ downloads
117 Record Views
Abstract
We consider the wagering market of NFL and NBA games when participating teams have secured playoff positions. We use both the opening and closing lines (analogous to asset prices) of spread bets to examine if potential “letdown” effects, either psychologically or strategically, are priced. Results demonstrate that the initial opening line consistently provides a profitable strategy for those betting against teams that have clinched positions in the post-season. By the close of the betting cycle, closing lines move in the expected direction as the market partially prices the letdown. Many closing lines tighten to the extent that, after paying commissions, the naïve strategy of betting against clinched teams is less profitable. However, certain wagers, for example betting against NFL teams that have clinched top seeds, are statistically significantly economically profitable after paying commissions. These results support the behavioral finance concepts of anchoring, affect, in addition to lines moving towards efficiency.
Files and links (1)
pdf
Anchoring, affect, and efficiency of sports gaming markets around playoff positioning823.92 kBDownloadView
Preprint Pre-print pdf Open Access
Related links
Details
Title
Anchoring, affect, and efficiency of sports gaming markets around playoff positioning
Publication Details
Financial Services Review, Vol.24(4), pp.313-329
Resource Type
Journal article
Publisher
Academy of Financial Services; United Kingdom
Series
24
Copyright
2015 Academy of Financial Services. All rights reserved.
Identifiers
99380090336406600
Academic Unit
Accounting and Finance; Lewis Bear Jr. College of Business
Language
English
Anchoring, affect, and efficiency of sports gaming markets around playoff positioning