Logo image
Ground Reaction Force Comparison between Barefoot and Shod Single Leg Landing At Varied Heights
Thesis   Open access

Ground Reaction Force Comparison between Barefoot and Shod Single Leg Landing At Varied Heights

Jocelyn Esther Arnett
University of West Florida Libraries
Master of Science (MS), University of West Florida
2020

Metrics

723 File views/ downloads
91 Record Views

Abstract

Landing is a common movement that occurs in many sports. Barefoot research has gained popularity in examining how shoes can alter natural movements. However, it is unknown how a single leg landing under barefoot conditions, as well as landing height, will affect ground reaction forces (GRF). PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to examine the differences in ground reaction forces during a single leg landing under barefoot and shod conditions from various heights. METHODS: Sixteen female Division II collegiate athletes, 8 basketball (age: 19.88 ± 0.64 yrs; height: 1.77 ± 0.09 m; mass: 75.76 ± 12.97 kg) and 8 volleyball (age: 20.00 ± 1.07 yrs; height: 1.74 ± 0.08 m; mass: 72.41 ± 5.41 kg), performed single leg landings from 12 inches, 18 inches, 24 inches, and 30 inches barefoot and shod. An AMTI AccuGait force plate was used to record GRF. A 2 (condition) x 4 (box height) x 2 (sport) repeated measures ANOVA was performed to determine any GRF differences. RESULTS: There were no significant three way or two-way interactions for GRF (p > 0.05). There was also no main effect for sport (p > 0.05). There were main effects for footwear and box height (p = 0.000) where shod (2295.121 ± 66.025 N) had greater impact than barefoot (2090.233 ± 62.684 N). CONCLUSIONS: Single leg shod landing produced greater vertical ground reaction forces (vGRF) than during a barefoot landing. Current research continues to be contradictory on whether or not barefoot activities lower GRF; therefore, it is important to continue research in this area.
pdf
Ground Reaction Force Comparison between Barefoot and Shod Single Leg Landing At Varied Heights1.04 MBDownloadView
Preprint Thesis pdf Open Access

Details

Logo image