Logo image
Abandoning strategy: Assessing negative feedback and the Bush doctrine
Conference paper   Open access

Abandoning strategy: Assessing negative feedback and the Bush doctrine

Jacob Shively
University of West Florida Libraries
The Politics of International Diffusion: Regional and Global Dimensions:ISA Annual Convention (San Francisco, CA, USA, 04/03/2013–04/06/2013)
2013

Metrics

6 File views/ downloads
239 Record Views

Abstract

This paper compares theories of grand strategy feedback by analyzing the Bush Doctrine during Bush's second term. By the time of his 2008 State of the Union address, George W. Bush had scaled back both his rhetoric and his willingness to apply assertive, unilateral pressure around the world. Why? Conventional wisdom suggests that external costs particularly related to the Iraq War--progressively constrained the administration's capacity to act. Yet theories of foreign policy and grand strategy change propose a range of other explanations for what type of feedback most profoundly affects a state's grand strategy. These include domestic political calculations, public opinion, economic interest groups, active veto players, rational analyses and systemic pressures. In order to determine which feedback source most influenced the Bush administration, I compare predicted values on each of these explanations with actual policy outcomes and debates during a series of salient decision-making periods. Findings suggest that domestic variables such as public opinion, veto players and economic interests mattered less than 1) elite perceptions of a gap between strategic goals and reality and 2) exogenous, systemic pressures. Nevertheless, the paper also concludes with a call for theory that integrates these competing explanations.
pdf
Abandoning strategy656.41 kBDownloadView
PresentationConference paper pdf Open Access

Related links

Details

Logo image